Actually I wasnt expecting a reply .It was as far as I was concerned just a statement to Donna ...and if she hadnt just shown a little critical thinking then I don't think anyone else was .So I would of left it. This situation reminds me of a Millgram experiment when when confronting someone with some perceived authority or control we will forgo what we see and accept as told. Taking the affirmation of the authoritive without due evaluation of what is right under our noses. But then this is the UK where we are renowned for our obseqiuence ...(unlike the french....).The one I am thinking of is the one where only one student says a line is longer than the other(which it is) but the other students ( who are in on it say no its not .)....He eventually concedes to the lie . Any Democracy is only as good as those who work to defend it ,and those who have any sort of power over us be it great or small must be prepared to accept that at times they can expect to be tested ,scrutinized and not necessarily taken at their word . It goes with the territory and they should be understanding of this and not dismissive of it ....and I think all here will agree with this . Lets be straight here this is not as personnel for me as you might think. I dont dislike you Andy...infact despite what I think are some wacko ideas you might have I get the feeling your on the whole a likeable guy. So lets get that out of the way. What you are as along with others at Holisticlocal is " human " . I also can well understand that I might "piss you off ".....you wont be the first ...I can asssure you!!! I,m outspoken and my views somewhat unconventional at times as I tend to demand a proposition live up to contradiction ...and this does "get" to some people. And here lies the problem...which actually to be honest I have avoided saying as theres a part of me that isnt really that bothered...and I dont think it will make one jot of difference here , as I think you have the game hand as the authority figure here ,and no one bar donna has even put their head up and said...youve got a point.... does sound odd . First off I really dont buy you not twigging what the video and post was about and who it was aimed at( especially in the context of not having been around for ages ( which others noted )) . then the bluff bluff...then the question regards computers and all this time you havent got a clue until on anther subject line ( choose where you want to fight ) )...you suddenly get it .........hmmmmm no not convinced. More importantly you start off saying yes you can block someone .... I quote: "I know that occasionally discussion forums will use this tactic as a last resort in order to deal with 'trolls' if they persistently keep rejoining (usually after having been banned) to cause more trouble. However, it's not a particularly effective tactic because all said troll needs to do is either change ISP, use an internet cafe, or use an anonymous proxy service." then later it turns into and I quote.... "As far as I'm aware there's no way at all we could prevent someone from just accessing Holistic Local. The only thing we potentially could do would be to prevent people with a particular IP address from LOGGING IN to the website. And right now we can't even do that because it's not a function that Jason has programmed in and I doubt he ever will." So this last one now contradicts the first one , which seemed to role off your tongue with some authority. Also you make claims about not having the programming to do it.Again I quote: "it's not a function that Jason has programmed in and I doubt he ever will." You see the trouble I have with this Andy is that this all just looks like you "manouevering " for some sort of covering position, that actually doesnt add up or represent reality. The website builder I told you about ( award winning by the way) took a look at this and just laughed , and said ..."you'r e in full control" of who can get access ,and what goes on on your site." The "software " you need is already on your computer .all you need to do is create an htaccess file or hypertext file or config file .Its something that website owners use all the time for various things. And in the case of wanting to block someone from accessing your site you simply write something like:
order deny,allow deny from 209.23.123.110
This will block access to your main pages, and all pages in all subdirectories. To block them from seeing only one, or some subdirectories, place the .htaccess directives above in the highest subdirectory that you want blocked. See http://support.im1.net/hosting/block_ips.htm Also if need be ..you can create whatever error message you want so that it looks like what you want it to look like .http://www.htaccess-guide.com/index.php?a=3 So you see going back to the millgram experiment ......Im being asked to believe your affirmation ( as others are ) when in actual fact the evidence stacks up pretty strong to the contrary .Of course one can always find a way of making an argument ....but contradiction will emerge at some point to make it clearer. I think your just doing a bit of the old Pied Piper as I cant think you and certainly not Jason will not know all this ... You appear to be mystifying what is quite straight forward and standard practice I think what your doing is putting some smoke around this ip address thing .... As you will know full well ...because its recorded on your page- visited- counters and in front of you on the screen ....that my ip address is different to everyone elses and stands out as being so .. As I use my mobile phone as a modem , the ip designated to 3 mobile is relatively static and only dynamic in the last 2 digits( whereas most others will change across the range ) and is really easy to deny ... It isnt regional...and relatively few users of it . Also though perhaps not traceable ( though there can be things in the error message ) this sort of thing is totally deduceable to one being blocked as once you rule out as I did possible problems with my provider or the search engine ...youve only got one conclusion to come to ....and then when I put the video up .... someone makes a reflex reaction because they know this will be the case ..... Again not straight away but in a few days. So there you go . Im sorry but I cant deny the evidence of my eyes and the lines of logic that have been followed here . If you can offer me something else then sure .....but leave coincidence out of it ...please !!! I remember once as a 9 year old I walked into a chemists and asked if he had some Salt Peter and he looked at me somewhat inquisitively and accusingly said " your trying to make gunpowder ..arent you?!!! To which I said with a look of shock horror at being so accused.... No! To some how add to the illusion of my being honest...I then asked with a look of total innocence on my face if he had any charcoal ( another essential ingredient of gun powder) .....To which he just said rather demonstrably again ...your trying to make gun powder !!!...again I stated infatigably ...No I wasn t !!!! Was I ?....course I was ..what else would a 9 yr old be doing !! Ps No, Ive never felt not welcome here nor persecuted and I like many of the folks here ,,,and I wont be keeping this going much longer either ...as yes it could effect the vibe if you let it . ....but Im not being funny with you nor do I intend to be in the future after this ....Its just life - Last edited: 1-06-2008 09:19:49 AM
Quote |